RSS

Good Resources, IMD223 Advanced Scripting, IMD345 UCD III - Written by Mat on Tuesday, July 29, 2008 20:55 - 0 Comments

Good Stuff at SitePoint

SitePoint has always been a great resource for all facets of web design … excellent book series, poignant articles and the like.  Here’s a few excerpts that caught my eye today …

Forum Post: design or develop first?

Q: "just wondering if I should go about designing my site first before implementing any back end capabilities. i like to keep things organized and plan ahead. It would seem to make sense to create the static site first but i am somewhat unsure if I were to design first and end up redesigning to fit everything I plan on adding later, in terms of dynamic content."

R: "The approach you take probably depends on whether you are more of a designer or more a developer. A developer would tend to do the back end first without worrying too much about exactly how the page will look until after they know that it all functions properly. A designer would probably get the page looking exactly how they want and then worry about how to get it to function correctly. If you have separate people performing each of these tasks then all that needs to be done first is to define the interface between the two so that the two almost separate parts can be done separately in the knowledge that they will fit together once both are done."

Article: HTML or XHTML: Does It Really Matter? (excerpted, July 9, 2008 by James Edwards)

HTML was originally conceived as a semantic language, in which elements should describe only the meaning of their content, not the presentation. However, this good intention didn’t hold up very long.

In 1997, the HTML 4.0 specification was published, and although it continued to include presentational markup that had been instigated directly by vendors, it also began a push to clean up HTML, calling some markup “deprecated” and suggesting that it not be used.

XHTML 1.0 came along in 2000 as formalization of HTML 4 into XML. XML itself had been standardized in 1998 as a general specification for defining markup languages, and was a stricter and simpler offshoot of SGML, the Standard Generalized Markup Language from which HTML itself was originally derived.

XHTML is still worth using, because it’s a transitional standard that moves us towards a pure-XML Web. XML is inherently better than SGML, because it’s simpler and stricter, and much easier to parse (once you’ve understood its rules). I don’t know from where we’ve adopted the idea that we should be forgiving of markup errors, but I don’t share that view.

And some other choice reads:

Share this post on digg, del.icio.us, facebook, blah blah blah


Leave a Reply

Comment



Quick Lists

A Little Reading Music

del.icio.us bookmarks Yummy Delicious

Meanwhile on Flickr ... [Web Ultimate Pool]

RCFinances.com
JurgenKnops.NL - nieuw design in 2009
Your RSS - READ +
Edit Profile READ +
Sign up - READ +
Home page - READ +
Sign in - READ +
MAC Book Pro Desktop Background  - Light
Clínica Crescer
staff jeans 05
New insideXO Design
DzineFolio

Reading Recommendations



More In


IMD345 UCD III

Nov 5, 2008 15:17 - 0 Comments

6 Steps for Building Successful Websites

More In IMD345 UCD III


Soapbox

Nov 5, 2008 15:17 - 0 Comments

6 Steps for Building Successful Websites

More In Soapbox